MindtickleYour AI teammate for every deal
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Mindtickle vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mindtickle is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 32.4 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Mindtickle if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (32.4 vs 1.5)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 27018:2019 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or SOC 2 or HIPAA or GDPR or 21 CFR Part 11 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus
Choose Qwilr if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Mindtickle | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 32.4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #5 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 8% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 45 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mindtickle 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mindtickle leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MindtickleQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Mindtickle ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mindtickle | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 27018:2019, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 42001:2023, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, 21 CFR Part 11, CSA STAR Level 1 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Professional services, Success specialists | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Undisclosed round · $281M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise sales teams | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Mindtickle
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mindtickle
- Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus
- Effective coaching and skills development
- AI role-play and video coaching
- High user ratings on G2
- Free starting tier
- Opaque, custom pricing behind contact-sales forms
- Needs a sizable team, content volume, and budget to implement
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mindtickle vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mindtickle-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.