OktaSecuring every identity, from AI to human
vs
SilverfortRuntime identity security for AI, AD and cloud
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Okta vs Silverfort
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 0 for Silverfort.
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 0)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Silverfort if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Okta | Silverfort |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 56.9% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.9% | no change0% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #2 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 12.2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 38 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 39% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Okta −3.3000000000000043pp · Silverfort 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OktaSilverfort
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Okta ranked higher
0Silverfort ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Okta | Silverfort |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $6 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | On-prem, cloud and hybrid |
| Integrations | 8000+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 | — |
| Support | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans | Standard support (included), Premier support, Diamond support, Expert Services |
| Founded | 2009 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Plano, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | IPO | Series D · $222M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. | Enterprises with Active Directory, legacy and hybrid environments that need to protect human, service-account and AI agent identities |
Plans side by side
Okta
Starter$6user/month, billed annually
Core Essentials$14user/month, billed annually
Essentials$17user/month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustomuser/month
EnterpriseCustomuser/month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Silverfort
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Okta vs Silverfort”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/okta-vs-silverfort, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.