OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
vs
WorkOSYour app, Enterprise Ready.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Omada vs WorkOS
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
WorkOS is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 9.5 versus 0.6 for Omada.
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
Choose WorkOS if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.5 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA or SIG Lite coverage
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Omada | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 9.5% |
| Change vs last week | up+0.6% | down−1.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #34 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Omada 0pp · WorkOS +0.5999999999999996pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
WorkOS leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OmadaWorkOS
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Omada ranked higher
0WorkOS ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Omada | WorkOS |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises | Cloud APIs and SDKs |
| Integrations | — | 20+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, SOC 3, SIG Lite |
| Support | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services | Email support, In-dashboard web support, Slack channel, Video calls |
| Founded | 2000 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Copenhagen, Denmark | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) | Seed · $195M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration | SaaS and AI companies that need to add enterprise features like SSO and SCIM to sell to large organizations. |
Plans side by side
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
WorkOS
- Highly transparent for B2B SaaS authentication
- Best overall choice for typical B2B SaaS authentication
- Purpose-built for B2B SaaS to quickly unlock enterprise contracts
- Generous free tier and usage-based pricing
- Rapid enterprise feature integration (SSO, SCIM, provisioning)
- Advanced enterprise SAML connections may incur extra costs
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Omada vs WorkOS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/omada-vs-workos, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.