Oneflow vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Oneflow is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 16.1 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Oneflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.1 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (32% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Oneflow | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 16.1% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #7 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 4.9% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 27 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 32% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Oneflow 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Oneflow leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Oneflow | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #6 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Oneflow | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | SaaS | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Dedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tier | — |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Private investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias Ståhlgren | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Teams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contracts | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Oneflow
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
- Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
- Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
- Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
- Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
- Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Oneflow vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/oneflow-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.