Skip to content
SlateIndex
PinFrom job description to booked interviews.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Pin vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 3.9 for Pin, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Pin if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 3.9)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 120+)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Pin Workable
Visibility score3.9%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#22#2
Share of voice1.6%7.2%
Mentions this run738
Positive in AI answers50%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Pin 4%

Pin 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
34.1%
AI Mode
5.9%
29.4%
Perplexity
5.7%
26.7%
PinWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

0Pin ranked higher
3Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionPinWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $100 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planYesNo · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations120+270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportKnowledge base, Email support, Onboarding and training (Professional and Enterprise), Dedicated account manager (Enterprise)Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20242012
Headquarters—Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees—201–500
FundingSeed · $3M raisedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forAgencies, founders, recruiting teams and hiring managers who need to fill open roles with outreach and scheduling handled.Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Pin

Free$0forever
Solo$100per user per month, billed annually
Professional$135per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pin pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Pin

Profile in progress.

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pin vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pin-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.