PinFrom job description to booked interviews.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Pin vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 3.9 for Pin, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Pin if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 3.9)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 120+)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pin | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.9% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #22 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pin 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PinWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Pin ranked higher
3Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Pin | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #7 | #3 |
| Alternatives to the most popular recruiting platform | AI Mode | #10 | #4 |
| Which recruiting platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #4 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pin | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 120+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support, Onboarding and training (Professional and Enterprise), Dedicated account manager (Enterprise) | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2024 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed · $3M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Agencies, founders, recruiting teams and hiring managers who need to fill open roles with outreach and scheduling handled. | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Pin
Free$0forever
Solo$100per user per month, billed annually
Professional$135per user per month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pin
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pin vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pin-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.