PipedriveCRM software sales teams will love
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Pipedrive vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Pipedrive is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 2.9 versus 1.5 for Qwilr, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Pipedrive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.9 vs 1.5)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or GDPR or EU-US DPF coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Visual sales pipeline management
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 44% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Pipedrive | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #22 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pipedrive 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Pipedrive leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PipedriveQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Pipedrive ranked higher
1Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Pipedrive | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which sales enablement platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pipedrive | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, GDPR, EU-US DPF | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Knowledge Base, Academy, Contact sales | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Majority buyout (Vista Equity Partners) | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Small and medium-sized sales teams wanting an easy-to-use, visual pipeline CRM | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Pipedrive
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pipedrive
- Visual sales pipeline management
- Easy to use with quick setup
- Built specifically for sales teams
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Annual billing savings and clear pricing
- May lack governance, service, and advanced reporting
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pipedrive vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pipedrive-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.