Pipedrive vs Reply.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Reply.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 3.9 for Pipedrive, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Pipedrive if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 42% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or EU-US DPF coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Visual sales pipeline management
Choose Reply.io if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 3.9)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
- 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pipedrive | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.9% | 14.4% |
| Change vs last week | no change0% | down−3.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #20 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 3.5% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 23 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pipedrive 0pp · Reply.io −3.299999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Reply.io leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Pipedrive | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Most affordable sales engagement platform that is still reliable | AI Mode | #8 | #5 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #10 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pipedrive | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $49 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 500+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, GDPR, EU-US DPF | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Knowledge Base, Academy, Contact sales | Live chat, Email, CSM onboarding |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Jose, California, US |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Majority buyout (Vista Equity Partners) | Series A |
| Best for | Small and medium-sized sales teams wanting an easy-to-use, visual pipeline CRM | Founders, sales teams, and agencies who need results fast without juggling 5+ tools. |
Plans side by side
Pipedrive
Pricing not available.
Reply.io
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pipedrive
- Visual sales pipeline management
- Easy to use with quick setup
- Built specifically for sales teams
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Annual billing savings and clear pricing
- May lack governance, service, and advanced reporting
Reply.io
- Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
- 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
- Transparent self-serve pricing with annual discounts
- Affordable, lower-cost option
- Strong choice for smaller and mid-market sales teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pipedrive vs Reply.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pipedrive-vs-reply-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.