Skip to content
SlateIndex
PlanviewStrategic Portfolio Management & Software Delivery Solutions
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

Planview vs Wrike

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 4 for Planview, and ranks ahead in 80% of the answers that name both.

Choose Planview if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (86% vs 39% positive)
  • Gold standard for massive enterprises
  • Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
  • Strong traditional project portfolio management

Choose Wrike if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 4)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
  • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
  • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Planview Wrike
Visibility score4%13.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#19#8
Share of voice1.4%4.4%
Mentions this run826
Positive in AI answers86%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Planview 4%

Planview 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.5%
18.9%
AI Mode
2.2%
2.2%
Perplexity
6.3%
19.3%
PlanviewWrike

Head to head in AI answers

5 engine answers name both brands

1Planview ranked higher
4Wrike ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionPlanviewWrike
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
Deployment—Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts
Integrations—400+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant
SupportCustomer Success Center, Submit a ticketProfessional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support
Founded19892006
HeadquartersAustin, TX, USASan Diego, California, US
Employees1,001–5,0001,001–5,000
FundingGrowth round (led by Insight Partners) · $25M raisedSeries B
Best for—Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale

Plans side by side

Planview

Pricing not available.

Wrike

Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Wrike pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Planview

  • Gold standard for massive enterprises
  • Robust resource capacity planning and financial tracking
  • Strong traditional project portfolio management
  • Recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
  • Suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization

    Wrike

    • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
    • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
    • Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
    • Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
    • Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Planview vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/planview-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.