Loopio vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loopio is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 1 for Upland Qvidian, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loopio if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (46% vs 0% positive)
- You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant coverage
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Loopio | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #15 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 2.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loopio 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loopio leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Loopio | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #10 | #11 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #9 | #10 |
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #2 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loopio | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Onboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support | — |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Strategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires. | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Plans side by side
Upland Qvidian
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loopio
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
- Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loopio vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loopio-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.