QuantifiedAI Sales Coaching & Roleplay That Wins
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Quantified vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 1.2 for Quantified.
Choose Quantified if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 1.2)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Quantified | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #31 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Quantified 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QuantifiedQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Quantified ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Quantified | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS in US East (Ohio) or Europe (Frankfurt), with a logically isolated tenant for each customer | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Team builds personas, scenarios and rubrics alongside the customer's team, Calibration of scoring with the customer's trainers, Hands-on help during rollout and a success team after launch, Email help@quantified.ai | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Life sciences and regulated commercial teams that must certify reps and keep messaging on-label, such as pharma launch and training teams | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Quantified
Base (Quantified AI Roleplay)Customquoted per team and program
Standard (Quantified AI Sales Coaching Platform)Customquoted per team and program
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Quantified
Profile in progress.
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Quantified vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/quantified-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.