Quickbase vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Quickbase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Quickbase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 2.4)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 13% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Quickbase | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.4% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #25 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 13% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Quickbase leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Quickbase | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #2 | #5 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #12 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Quickbase | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 40+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 1999 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Funding round | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Quickbase vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/quickbase-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.