QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
SeismicThe AI platform for revenue execution
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs Seismic
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Seismic is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 55.2 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 39% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
Choose Seismic if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.2 vs 1.5)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Seismic |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 55.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #28 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 9.9% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Seismic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Seismic leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrSeismic
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0Seismic ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Seismic |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | — |
| Integrations | — | 150+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Series E, led by Lightspeed Venture Partners · $440M raised |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Global enterprise sales, marketing and customer-facing teams in financial services, manufacturing, technology and life sciences |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Seismic
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Seismic
- Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
- Deep analytics and AI-powered revenue execution
- Strong for large enterprises needing content personalization and automation
- Highly rated on G2 and Gartner review data
- Broad enablement platform combining content, training, coaching, and buyer engagement
- Expensive, custom pricing with no transparent or free option
- Heavy and overkill for smaller or early-stage teams
- Long deployment timelines of three to six months
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Seismic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-seismic, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.