QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
ShowpadAI-native revenue effectiveness platform specifically designed for complex field-selling.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs Showpad
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Showpad is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 29.6 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 45% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
Choose Showpad if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.6 vs 1.5)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISAE 3402 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong content management and buyer engagement
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Showpad |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 29.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #28 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 7.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 41 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 45% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Showpad 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Showpad leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrShowpad
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0Showpad ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Showpad |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | — |
| Integrations | — | 75+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2 Type II, ISAE 3402, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | Help Center, Showpad Academy on-demand training, The Rev customer community, Professional Services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Series D |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Field-first revenue teams in complex, field-driven industries such as manufacturing, consumer packaged goods and medical devices. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Showpad
- Strong content management and buyer engagement
- Intuitive user experience for sales reps
- Integrated content, training, and coaching in one platform
- Good fit for field sales and mobile or offline access
- AI capabilities and specialized agents
- Can run pricier per seat
- Pricing not transparent and requires a sales call
- No self-serve free trial or month-to-month plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Showpad”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-showpad, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.