QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
SmartWinnrThe #1 AI Roleplays Platform. Built for Regulated Industries.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs SmartWinnr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0 for SmartWinnr.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
Choose SmartWinnr if…
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR or CCPA or Cloud Security Alliance STAR registrant coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | SmartWinnr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #28 | #51 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · SmartWinnr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrSmartWinnr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0SmartWinnr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | SmartWinnr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Cloud, hosted on AWS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, Cloud Security Alliance STAR registrant |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | Global support team with response time under 1 hour |
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Walnut, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Accelerator/incubator round (IIIT-H Foundation, T-Hub) |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Sales and L&D teams in regulated industries such as pharma and MedTech |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
SmartWinnr
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
SmartWinnr
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs SmartWinnr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-smartwinnr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.