QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
tl;dvThe AI Notetaker built for Team Collaboration
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs tl;dv
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
tl;dv is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
Choose tl;dv if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 51% positive)
- You need GDPR or EU AI Act coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #28 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · tl;dv 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
tl;dv leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Qwilrtl;dv
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qwilr ranked higher
0tl;dv ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 5000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EU AI Act |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | AI-supported chat and self-serve help center, Email and chat support, Priority customer support, Dedicated Success Manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Aachen, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Seed (€4.3M, led by K Fund) |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Sales, customer success and internal teams that want meeting notes and CRM updates automated |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
tl;dv
Free$0forever
Pro$18per seat/month, billed annually
Business$29per seat/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
tl;dv
- robust free plan for recording and transcribing calls
- AI summaries of Zoom and Google Meet sales calls
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs tl;dv”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-tl-dv, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.