QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
ZohoCloud software suite for businesses
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Qwilr vs Zoho
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.8 for Zoho, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.8)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 50% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
Choose Zoho if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong value for money and low cost
- Free tier for small teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qwilr | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 28.3% | 3.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #4 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 7.2% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 37 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 51% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qwilr 0pp · Zoho 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QwilrZoho
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
2Qwilr ranked higher
1Zoho ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Qwilr | Zoho |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top proposal and contract tool options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #3 | #11 |
| What is the typical pricing model for Proposals & Contracts software? | AI Mode | #2 | #4 |
| What are the pros and cons of Better Proposals? | ChatGPT | #7 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qwilr | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $35 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Web-based, web-native software | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia | Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. | Businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Zoho
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Zoho
- Strong value for money and low cost
- Free tier for small teams
- Broad functionality and integrated app ecosystem
- Good customization options
- Scales well as businesses grow
- Less premium user experience
- Pricing varies dramatically across products
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Zoho”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-zoho, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.