RecruitBPMAI-Powered Applicant Tracking, CRM and Hiring Automation Platform for the Top Staffing Professionals
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
RecruitBPM vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.7 for RecruitBPM.
Choose RecruitBPM if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29 vs $299)
- You need GDPR coverage
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.7)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 200+)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | RecruitBPM | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.7% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #43 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
RecruitBPM 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
RecruitBPMWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0RecruitBPM ranked higher
0Workable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | RecruitBPM | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $29 / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 200+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Account manager and technical team training after subscription, Video training, Built-in knowledgebase, Email support at support@recruitbpm.com | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Eden Prairie, MN, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Staffing and recruitment firms | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
RecruitBPM
Staffing Agency Premium (monthly billing)$89user/month billed monthly
Staffing Agency Premium (annual billing)$59user/month billed annually
Essential (annual billing, lower price set)$29month
Premium (annual billing, lower price set)$69month
Enterprise (annual billing, lower price set)$169month
Essential (monthly billing, higher price set)$39month
Premium (monthly billing, higher price set)$99month
Enterprise (monthly billing, higher price set)$199month
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
RecruitBPM
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “RecruitBPM vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/recruitbpm-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.