Skip to content
SlateIndex
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Recruiterflow vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 3.1 for Recruiterflow, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Recruiterflow if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $299)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 3.1)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 30+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 33% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Recruiterflow Workable
Visibility score3.1%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#30#2
Share of voice0.7%7.2%
Mentions this run438
Positive in AI answers33%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Recruiterflow 3%

Recruiterflow 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.6%
34.1%
AI Mode
0%
29.4%
Perplexity
6.7%
26.7%
RecruiterflowWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

1Recruiterflow ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
PromptEngineRecruiterflowWorkable
Best recruiting platform with AI features Perplexity#9#1
Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? Perplexity#4#6

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionRecruiterflowWorkable
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$149 per seat / mo$299 / mo
Free planNoNo · 15-day trial
DeploymentSaaSCloud-based SaaS
Integrations30+270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPRISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportSLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articlesPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded20172012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingBootstrappedSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forRetained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRMCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

Recruiterflow

Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Recruiterflow pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Recruiterflow

  • Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
  • Priced at $119/user/month billed annually

Workable

  • fast deployment and ease of use
  • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
  • transparent pricing and free trial
  • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
  • candidate sourcing
  • costs more than lightweight ATS options

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Recruiterflow vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/recruiterflow-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.