Skip to content
SlateIndex
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

SeekOut vs TestGorilla

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SeekOut is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.

Choose SeekOut if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.6)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
  • Strong for sourcing passive talent

Choose TestGorilla if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric SeekOut TestGorilla
Visibility score5.3%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#18#59
Share of voice1.9%0.4%
Mentions this run112
Positive in AI answers25%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3SeekOut 5%

SeekOut 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SeekOut leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.8%
0.9%
AI Mode
3.7%
0.9%
Perplexity
4.4%
0%
SeekOutTestGorilla

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0SeekOut ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSeekOutTestGorilla
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$149 per seat / moFree; paid from $74 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialYes
DeploymentCloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant
SupportHelp center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full planHelp center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides
Founded20172020
HeadquartersBellevue, WA, United StatesAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeries C · $189M raisedSeries A · $80M raised
Best forSolo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnelSmall companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan).

Plans side by side

SeekOut

SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
SeekOut pricing

TestGorilla

Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
TestGorilla pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

SeekOut

  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
  • Strong for sourcing passive talent
  • Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

TestGorilla

  • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “SeekOut vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/seekout-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.