Skip to content
SlateIndex
SmartRecruitersAI-Powered Hiring Platform That Delivers Results
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

SmartRecruiters vs TestGorilla

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

SmartRecruiters is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 13.6 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.

Choose SmartRecruiters if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.6 vs 0.6)
  • You need TISAX or CCPA or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or UK Cyber Essentials coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features

Choose TestGorilla if…

  • You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
  • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric SmartRecruiters TestGorilla
Visibility score13.6%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#13#59
Share of voice3.7%0.4%
Mentions this run212
Positive in AI answers31%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3SmartRecruiters 14%

SmartRecruiters 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

SmartRecruiters leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
15%
0.9%
AI Mode
4.8%
0.9%
Perplexity
21.1%
0%
SmartRecruitersTestGorilla

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0SmartRecruiters ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSmartRecruitersTestGorilla
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSaaS—
ComplianceTISAX, CCPA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, UK Cyber EssentialsGDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant
SupportCommunity & Help Center, Developer DocumentationHelp center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides
Founded20102020
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries E · $205M raisedSeries A · $80M raised
Best forCorporate employers with at least 50 employees and a significant number of open job requisitionsSmall companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan).

Plans side by side

SmartRecruiters

Pricing not available.

TestGorilla

Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
TestGorilla pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

SmartRecruiters

  • Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
  • Suited to high-growth global enterprises
  • Modern, collaborative interface
  • Broad, consolidated talent-acquisition suite
  • Enterprise hiring and collaborative applicant tracking platform

    TestGorilla

    • automated sending of tests and automatic score return

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “SmartRecruiters vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/smartrecruiters-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.