Tana vs XWiki

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Tana is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 1.3 versus 0.3 for XWiki.

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Tana	XWiki
Visibility score	1.3%	0.3%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in Knowledge Management	#42	#48
Share of voice	0.6%	0.2%
Mentions this run	3	1
Positive in AI answers	—	0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Tana 0pp · XWiki 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Tana leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

1.7%

0.9%

AI Mode

0.9%

Perplexity

1.3%

TanaXWiki

0 engine answers name both brands

0Tana ranked higher

0XWiki ranked higher

Dimension	Tana	XWiki
Pricing model	Per seat	—
Entry price	Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo	—
Free plan	Yes	—
Deployment	Desktop app for Mac, Windows and Linux, plus web	Self-hosted or on-premise, plus a managed cloud service (XWiki Cloud) and Docker images.
Compliance	SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant	—
Support	FAQ on tana.inc, Designated customer success manager on the Business plan	Community support, Professional support
Founded	—	2004
Headquarters	Palo Alto, CA, United States	Paris, France
Employees	11–50	51–200
Funding	Series A · $25M raised	NGI funding (European Commission) for the WAISE project · $0M raised
Best for	AI-native teams whose agents need meeting context	Organisations that need a knowledge base, collaborative intranet, public website or business applications built inside a wiki.