Teamtailor vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 5.4 for Teamtailor, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Teamtailor if…
- You need more native integrations (561+ vs 270+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 44% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or SOC 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 5.4)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Teamtailor | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.4% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #17 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Teamtailor 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Teamtailor | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a recruiting platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #8 | #6 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| Best recruiting platform for startups | AI Mode | #4 | #2 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #8 | #7 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #15 | #9 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #11 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Teamtailor | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 561+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2 | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Customer support for all users | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Stockholm, Sweden | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Growth round (EUR 5M, undated) · $17M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Companies of all sizes that want one system for hiring | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Teamtailor
Pricing not available.
Workable
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Teamtailor
- Collaborative team recruitment
- Strong employer branding
- Seamless, automated candidate experience
- High G2 rating (4.6/5)
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Teamtailor vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/teamtailor-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.