Greenhouse vs Teamtailor
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 5.4 for Teamtailor, and ranks ahead in 63% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 5.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
Choose Teamtailor if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or SOC 2 coverage
- Collaborative team recruitment
- Strong employer branding
- Seamless, automated candidate experience
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 5.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 1.6% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · Teamtailor 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
8 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a recruiting platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #1 | #8 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #1 | #5 |
| Which recruiting platform has the best reviews? | ChatGPT | #4 | #1 |
| Which recruiting platform has the best reviews? | AI Mode | #4 | #3 |
| Which recruiting platform has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #5 | #3 |
| Compare the leading recruiting platforms | ChatGPT | #1 | #8 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #15 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Teamtailor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Integrations | — | 561+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, SOC 2 |
| Support | — | Customer support for all users |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Growth round (EUR 5M, undated) · $17M raised |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Companies of all sizes that want one system for hiring |
Plans side by side
Teamtailor
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Teamtailor
- Collaborative team recruitment
- Strong employer branding
- Seamless, automated candidate experience
- High G2 rating (4.6/5)
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs Teamtailor”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-teamtailor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.