Skip to content
SlateIndex
TeamworkMost tools track work. We make it profitable.
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

Teamwork vs Wrike

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 9.6 for Teamwork, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Teamwork if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($9.99 vs $10)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
  • Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services

Choose Wrike if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 9.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 12% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Teamwork Wrike
Visibility score9.6%13.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#11#8
Share of voice2.5%4.4%
Mentions this run1526
Positive in AI answers12%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Teamwork 10%

Teamwork 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Wrike leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
5.6%
18.9%
AI Mode
1.1%
2.2%
Perplexity
22.2%
19.3%
TeamworkWrike

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

0Teamwork ranked higher
7Wrike ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionTeamworkWrike
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $9.99 per seat / moFree; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud-hosted SaaS on Amazon Web Services, with US or EU data hosting.Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts
Integrations—400+
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant
SupportPremium support, Dedicated customer success manager (Enterprise), Free expert training, Onboarding servicesProfessional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support
Founded19992006
HeadquartersCork, IrelandSan Diego, California, US
Employees201–5001,001–5,000
FundingGrowth investment from Bregal MilestoneSeries B
Best forAgencies, consultancies, IT services and implementation teams that bill clients for project work.Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale

Plans side by side

Teamwork

Free$0per user/month billed yearly
Basics$9.99per user/month billed yearly
Accelerate$24.99per user/month billed yearly
OptimizeCustomper user/month billed yearly, contact sales
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Teamwork pricing

Wrike

Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Wrike pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Teamwork

  • Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
  • Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services
  • Included in strong general project management shortlist

    Wrike

    • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
    • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
    • Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
    • Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
    • Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Teamwork vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/teamwork-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.