UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
vs
ZapierBuild and scale AI workflows and agents across 9,000+ apps
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
UiPath vs Zapier
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Zapier is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 3.5 for UiPath.
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 29% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Zapier if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 3.5)
- You want a lower entry price ($19.99 vs $25)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | UiPath | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #28 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1.3% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
UiPath 0pp · Zapier 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Zapier leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
UiPathZapier
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0UiPath ranked higher
0Zapier ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | UiPath | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | Free; paid from $19.99 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped | Multi-tenant cloud |
| Integrations | — | 9000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum | Email support, Live chat on Professional plans from the 2,000 task tier, Priority support on Team and Enterprise, Technical Account Manager on set thresholds or as an add-on |
| Founded | 2005 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised | Equity crowdfunding |
| Best for | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform | Businesses from first-time founders to the Fortune 500 that want AI and automation across many apps. |
Plans side by side
UiPath
Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Zapier
Free$0month
Professional$19.99month (starting from)
Team$69month (starting from)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Zapier
- Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
- Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
- Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
- Widely adopted general integration and workflow tool
- Free tier with no time limit or credit card needed
- Free plans have limited monthly activities
- Not a standalone marketing automation platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “UiPath vs Zapier”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/uipath-vs-zapier, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.