AvaHR alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside AvaHR
GreenhouseBest forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises50% of AvaHR answersWorkableBest forCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.50% of AvaHR answersAshbyBest forAmbitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring50% of AvaHR answersManatalBest forHR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters50% of AvaHR answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
AvaHR has a visibility score of 1.1 in Recruiting, #52 of 83. AI answers that name AvaHR most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Contact sales | 38.5% | Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal |
| Workable | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. | $299 / mo | 30.1% | An AI agent built into a full applicant tracking system, which reads the system of record before it acts and inherits the platform's security and access model. |
| Ashby | Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring | $400 / mo | 17.4% | An all-in-one platform that combines ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics, with AI embedded in every layer |
| Manatal | HR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters | $15 per seat / mo | 15% | Claims to be the first ATS to offer an MCP server that connects to LLMs such as ChatGPT. |
Alternative 1
Greenhouse vs AvaHR →Greenhouse
Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting
Key features
- Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
- Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
- Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
- Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.
Greenhouse vs AvaHR
| Dimension | Greenhouse | AvaHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 1.1% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $119 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | — | 7-day free trial |
Pros
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Cons
Alternative 2
Workable vs AvaHR →Workable
Workable suits companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses..
Quick facts
- $299 / mo · flat tiers
- 15-day free trial
- 30.1% visibility score · #2 in Recruiting
- 270+ native integrations
Key features
- Workable ATS — Applicant tracking system covering requisitions, sourcing, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics.
- Workable Agent — AI recruiting agents that source, screen and engage candidates inside the ATS, sold as four agents including Sourcing, Screening and Engagement.
- Workable HR — HR information system with employee onboarding, time off, time tracking, e-signatures and payroll preparation.
- Performance & Engagement — 360-degree performance reviews, performance tracking and employee surveys, sold as an add-on.
Workable vs AvaHR
| Dimension | Workable | AvaHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 30.1% | 1.1% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | $119 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 15-day free trial | 7-day free trial |
Pros
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
Cons
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Alternative 3
Ashby vs AvaHR →Ashby
Ashby suits ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring.
Quick facts
- $400 / mo · flat tiers
- 17.4% visibility score · #7 in Recruiting
- 250+ native integrations
Key features
- Ashby All-in-One — One recruiting platform covering ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling, offers and analytics.
- Ashby Analytics — Recruiting analytics that run on top of an existing applicant tracking system.
Ashby vs AvaHR
| Dimension | Ashby | AvaHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.4% | 1.1% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $400 / mo | $119 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | — | 7-day free trial |
Pros
- Deep data visibility
- Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
- Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
- Good for data-driven recruiting teams
- Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software
Cons
Alternative 4
Manatal vs AvaHR →Manatal
Manatal suits hR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters.
Quick facts
- $15 per seat / mo · per seat
- 14-day free trial
- 15% visibility score · #8 in Recruiting
- 2500+ native integrations
Key features
- Manatal ATS — Applicant tracking system with customizable pipelines, a Kanban board, and candidate profiles.
- Recruitment CRM — CRM for agencies and headhunters to track clients, placements, and revenue.
- Manatal AI — AI Interviewer for automated screening, AI Copilot for candidate summaries, and AI candidate recommendations and scoring.
- Candidate Sourcing — Job posting to job boards and a Chrome sourcing extension, with candidate profile enrichment from social and public platforms.
Manatal vs AvaHR
| Dimension | Manatal | AvaHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15% | 1.1% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $15 per seat / mo | $119 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 14-day free trial | 7-day free trial |
Pros
- Advanced AI-driven candidate enrichment and match scoring
- Affordable pricing with annual savings
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Cheapest per-recruiter pricing among compared tools
- Recommended for lower-cost recruiting software
Cons
- Entry plan limits the number of open jobs
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| AvaHR | Flat tiers | $119 / mo |
| Greenhouse | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
| Workable | Flat tiers | $299 / mo |
| Ashby | Flat tiers | $400 / mo |
| Manatal | Per seat | $15 per seat / mo |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside AvaHR in the latest weekly run.