AvaHR vs Greenhouse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 1.1 for AvaHR, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AvaHR if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 1.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AvaHR | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.1% | 38.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #52 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 8.1% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 43 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 56% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AvaHR 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AvaHR | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting platform has the best reviews? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AvaHR | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $119 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 81+ | — |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS |
| Support | Email and chat support, Priority phone support on Premium, Dedicated success manager on Max | — |
| Founded | 2016 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Phoenix, Arizona | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Raised Funding Round | Series D · $110M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses without a recruiting team, where the owner or office manager does the hiring. | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises |
Plans side by side
AvaHR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AvaHR
Profile in progress.
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AvaHR vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avahr-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.