Skip to content
SlateIndex

Recruitly alternatives

New

The AI operating system for recruitment agencies

RecruitingAlderley Park, Cheshire, England, United Kingdom11–50 employees

Visibility score
0.7%
New vs last week
Weekly run · Nov 3

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Alternatives · updated Nov 3, 2026

Recruitly alternatives: top competitors compared

Recruitly has a visibility score of 0.7 in Recruiting, #55 of 83. AI answers that name Recruitly most often also name these 4.

Quick reference

AlternativeBest forStarting priceVisibilityKey differentiator
GreenhouseEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesContact sales38.5%Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal
WorkableCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.$299 / mo30.1%An AI agent built into a full applicant tracking system, which reads the system of record before it acts and inherits the platform's security and access model.
LeverSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.—22.2%ATS and CRM combined in one platform, with AI built across the hiring funnel rather than added through separate tools.
AshbyAmbitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring$400 / mo17.4%An all-in-one platform that combines ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics, with AI embedded in every layer

Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.

Quick facts

  • Contact sales · flat tiers
  • 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting

Key features

  • Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
  • Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
  • Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
  • Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.

Greenhouse vs Recruitly

DimensionGreenhouseRecruitly
Visibility score38.5%0.7%
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $25 per seat / mo
Free planNoYes
Trial—Free plan available

Pros

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

Cons

    Full Greenhouse vs Recruitly comparison

    Workable suits companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses..

    Quick facts

    • $299 / mo · flat tiers
    • 15-day free trial
    • 30.1% visibility score · #2 in Recruiting
    • 270+ native integrations

    Key features

    • Workable ATS — Applicant tracking system covering requisitions, sourcing, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics.
    • Workable Agent — AI recruiting agents that source, screen and engage candidates inside the ATS, sold as four agents including Sourcing, Screening and Engagement.
    • Workable HR — HR information system with employee onboarding, time off, time tracking, e-signatures and payroll preparation.
    • Performance & Engagement — 360-degree performance reviews, performance tracking and employee surveys, sold as an add-on.

    Workable vs Recruitly

    DimensionWorkableRecruitly
    Visibility score30.1%0.7%
    Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
    Entry price$299 / moFree; paid from $25 per seat / mo
    Free planNoYes
    Trial15-day free trialFree plan available

    Pros

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing

    Cons

    • costs more than lightweight ATS options
    Full Workable vs Recruitly comparison

    Lever suits small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations..

    Quick facts

    • Pricing not available
    • 22.2% visibility score · #3 in Recruiting

    Key features

    • Lever AI-Powered Hiring Platform — ATS and CRM in one platform with reporting, AI screening, unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries, and AI fraud prevention signals.
    • Candidate Insights — Add-on that surfaces skills, fit, assessments and reference data in the candidate profile.
    • AI Screening by VONQ — Add-on that pre-screens candidates with AI agents embedded in the career site.
    • Onboarding — Add-on for automated new hire workflows, task management and document collection.

    Lever vs Recruitly

    DimensionLeverRecruitly
    Visibility score22.2%0.7%
    Pricing model—Per seat
    Entry price—Free; paid from $25 per seat / mo
    Free plan—Yes
    Trial—Free plan available

    Pros

    • Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
    • Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
    • Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies

    Cons

      Full Lever vs Recruitly comparison

      Ashby suits ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring.

      Quick facts

      • $400 / mo · flat tiers
      • 17.4% visibility score · #7 in Recruiting
      • 250+ native integrations

      Key features

      • Ashby All-in-One — One recruiting platform covering ATS, CRM and sourcing, scheduling, offers and analytics.
      • Ashby Analytics — Recruiting analytics that run on top of an existing applicant tracking system.

      Ashby vs Recruitly

      DimensionAshbyRecruitly
      Visibility score17.4%0.7%
      Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
      Entry price$400 / moFree; paid from $25 per seat / mo
      Free planNoYes
      Trial—Free plan available

      Pros

      • Deep data visibility
      • Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
      • Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
      • Good for data-driven recruiting teams
      • Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software

      Cons

        Full Ashby vs Recruitly comparison

        How to choose

        Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.

        PlatformPricing modelStarting price
        RecruitlyPer seatFree; paid from $25 per seat / mo
        GreenhouseFlat tiersContact sales
        WorkableFlat tiers$299 / mo
        Lever——
        AshbyFlat tiers$400 / mo

        More alternatives

        Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Recruitly in the latest weekly run.

        Cite as: SlateIndex, “Recruitly AI visibility profile”, https://slateindex.ai/brand/recruitly, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.