Recruitly vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 0.7 for Recruitly, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Recruitly if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR tooling coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 0.7)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 68+)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Recruitly | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #55 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Recruitly 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Recruitly | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | AI Mode | #4 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Recruitly | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud, used in a web browser | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 68+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | GDPR tooling | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Email support and knowledge base (Solo plan), Group training sessions (Professional plan), Dedicated training and customer success manager (Enterprise plan) | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Alderley Park, Cheshire, England, United Kingdom | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Recruitment agencies, from independent recruiters to growing agencies and larger teams | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Recruitly
Workable
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Recruitly
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Recruitly vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/recruitly-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.