6sense6sense reimagines the way revenue teams create, manage and convert pipeline into revenue.
vs
CloseThe CRM that does the work
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
6sense vs Close
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0.3 for 6sense.
Choose 6sense if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or TRUSTe GDPR validation coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 6sense | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.4% | down−0.6% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #42 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
6sense −0.39999999999999997pp · Close −0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
6senseClose
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
06sense ranked higher
0Close ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 6sense | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Subscription SaaS, priced by seat with extra fees tied to feature usage. | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, TRUSTe GDPR validation | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Dedicated customer success managers, Quarterly business reviews | Knowledge base, Email support |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $426M raised | Angel |
| Best for | Sales and marketing teams at B2B organizations. | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS |
Plans side by side
6sense
Pricing not available.
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
6sense
Profile in progress.
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “6sense vs Close”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/6sense-vs-close, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.