Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
AttentiveThe omnichannel marketing platform redefining how brands and people connect
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Attentive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Act-On is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0 for Attentive.
Choose Act-On if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Attentive if…
- You need CCPA or GDPR or SOC 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Attentive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #41 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Attentive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Act-On leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnAttentive
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
0Attentive ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Attentive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | — | CCPA, GDPR, SOC 2 |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Dedicated support team with 24/5 service, Hands-on support from in-house experts, Dedicated customer success manager on the top plan |
| Founded | 2008 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Series E · $863M raised |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Ecommerce and retail brands that want SMS and email run together in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Attentive
SMS, email, RCS & pushCustombased on list size and messages sent
Text & emailCustombased on list size and messages sent
TextCustombased on list size and messages sent
Everything you need to grow with AttentiveCustomcustom pricing based on volume and needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Attentive
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Attentive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-attentive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.