Skip to content
SlateIndex
Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2

Act-On vs HubSpot

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 73.1 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Act-On if…

  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

Choose HubSpot if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (73.1 vs 1)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Act-On HubSpot
Visibility score1%73.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Marketing Automation#31#1
Share of voice0.5%13.1%
Mentions this run372
Positive in AI answers33%35%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Act-On 1%

Act-On 0pp · HubSpot 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
74.4%
AI Mode
1.1%
77.2%
Perplexity
0%
67.6%
Act-OnHubSpot

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

0Act-On ranked higher
3HubSpot ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAct-OnHubSpot
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry price$900 / moFree; paid from $7 per seat / mo
Free planNoYes
Onboarding fee—$3,000
Deployment—Cloud
Integrations—2000+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportStandard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for EnterprisePhone
Founded20082006
HeadquartersPortland, Oregon, United StatesCambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Employees201–5005,000+
FundingRound of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raisedCorporate round
Best forMidsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices.Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM.

Plans side by side

Act-On

Professional$900month (2,500 active contacts/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Act-On pricing

HubSpot

Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
HubSpot pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Act-On

  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

    HubSpot

    • intuitive, user-friendly interface
    • generous free tier
    • all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
    • tight CRM integration for live chat and service
    • good fit for startups and small businesses
    • higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
    • higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs HubSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-hubspot, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.