Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs HubSpot
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 73.1 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (73.1 vs 1)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 73.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 13.1% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 72 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 35% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · HubSpot 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnHubSpot
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
3HubSpot ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #2 |
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #7 | #1 |
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | — | $3,000 |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Phone |
| Founded | 2008 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Corporate round |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs HubSpot”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-hubspot, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.