Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
Constant ContactTools to simplify and amplify digital marketing for small businesses
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Constant Contact
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Constant Contact is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 3.5 versus 1 for Act-On.
Choose Act-On if…
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Constant Contact if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.5 vs 1)
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- best for small businesses
- simple email campaigns for small businesses
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Constant Contact |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 3.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #21 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Constant Contact 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Constant Contact leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnConstant Contact
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
0Constant Contact ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Constant Contact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2008 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Waltham, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Funding round led by Clearlake-managed vehicle Icon Partners VI (amount not disclosed) |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Small businesses and nonprofits |
Plans side by side
Constant Contact
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Constant Contact
- best for small businesses
- simple email campaigns for small businesses
- saves money with annual prepay discounts
- accessible campaign creation, automation and social tools
- best for nonprofits and events
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Constant Contact”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-constant-contact, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.