Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
GetResponseLifecycle automation that helps businesses turn customers into repeat revenue.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs GetResponse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GetResponse is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 6.2 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose GetResponse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.2 vs 1)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need PCI DSS or GDPR coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | GetResponse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 6.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 12 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · GetResponse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GetResponse leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnGetResponse
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
1GetResponse ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | GetResponse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top marketing automation platform vendors | ChatGPT | #14 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | GetResponse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | Free; paid from $19 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Integrations | — | 150+ |
| Compliance | — | PCI DSS, GDPR |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | 24/7 chatbot in all languages, Live chat in English and Polish, Email support in English, Polish, German, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Italian, Dedicated Customer Experience Manager on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2008 | 1998 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Gdańsk, Poland |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Entrepreneurs, ecommerce stores and global brands that want email, automation and landing pages in one platform. |
Plans side by side
GetResponse
Starter$19month (1,000 contacts; $15.58/mo billed annually)
Marketer$59month (1,000 contacts; $48.38/mo billed annually)
Creator$69month (1,000 contacts; $56.58/mo billed annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
GetResponse
- Annual plan discounts of about 18% to 30%
- 14-day free trial without a credit card
- Strong for webinars
- Integrated content monetization and landing page funnels
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs GetResponse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-getresponse, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.