Skip to content
SlateIndex
Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
GetResponseLifecycle automation that helps businesses turn customers into repeat revenue.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2

Act-On vs GetResponse

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

GetResponse is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 6.2 versus 1 for Act-On, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Act-On if…

  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

Choose GetResponse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.2 vs 1)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need PCI DSS or GDPR coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Act-On GetResponse
Visibility score1%6.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Marketing Automation#31#16
Share of voice0.5%2.2%
Mentions this run312
Positive in AI answers33%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Act-On 1%

Act-On 0pp · GetResponse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

GetResponse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
3.9%
AI Mode
1.1%
5.2%
Perplexity
0%
9.4%
Act-OnGetResponse

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Act-On ranked higher
1GetResponse ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAct-OnGetResponse
Pricing modelUsage-basedFlat tiers
Entry price$900 / moFree; paid from $19 / mo
Free planNoYes
Integrations—150+
Compliance—PCI DSS, GDPR
SupportStandard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise24/7 chatbot in all languages, Live chat in English and Polish, Email support in English, Polish, German, Spanish, Portuguese, French and Italian, Dedicated Customer Experience Manager on Enterprise plan
Founded20081998
HeadquartersPortland, Oregon, United StatesGdańsk, Poland
Employees201–500201–500
FundingRound of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raisedBootstrapped
Best forMidsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices.Entrepreneurs, ecommerce stores and global brands that want email, automation and landing pages in one platform.

Plans side by side

Act-On

Professional$900month (2,500 active contacts/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Act-On pricing

GetResponse

Starter$19month (1,000 contacts; $15.58/mo billed annually)
Marketer$59month (1,000 contacts; $48.38/mo billed annually)
Creator$69month (1,000 contacts; $56.58/mo billed annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
GetResponse pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Act-On

  • Favored for mid-market demand generation
  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • Fast deployment

    GetResponse

    • Annual plan discounts of about 18% to 30%
    • 14-day free trial without a credit card
    • Strong for webinars
    • Integrated content monetization and landing page funnels

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs GetResponse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-getresponse, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.