Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
KeilaEasy and reliable open source email newsletters
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs Keila
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Act-On is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0 for Keila.
Choose Act-On if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0)
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Choose Keila if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | Keila |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #44 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · Keila 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Act-On leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnKeila
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Act-On ranked higher
0Keila ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | Keila |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | — | Self-hosted with an official Docker image, or managed through Keila Cloud |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Direct support for Keila Cloud customers with templates, forms and spam complaints, Paid help setting up a self-hosted instance |
| Founded | 2008 | — |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Seybothenreuth, Germany |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Organisations that want an open-source, EU-hosted alternative to Mailchimp, whether self-hosted or managed |
Plans side by side
Keila
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
Keila
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs Keila”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-keila, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.