AgiloftAI-powered contract lifecycle management software
vs
Conga CPQProposals & Contracts
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Agiloft vs Conga CPQ
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Agiloft is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.4 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ.
Choose Agiloft if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.4 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 coverage
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 36% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Agiloft | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #22 | #44 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Agiloft 0pp · Conga CPQ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Agiloft leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AgiloftConga CPQ
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Agiloft ranked higher
0Conga CPQ ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Agiloft | Conga CPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Hosted service on AWS, with redundant infrastructure inside or outside the USA | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application |
| Integrations | 1000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA |
| Support | Professional Services and Training, Technical Support, Customer Success, Agiloft University | — |
| Founded | 1991 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, California, US | Houston, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Strategic investment, KKR | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures |
| Best for | Enterprise legal, procurement and sales teams that need to tailor contract workflows without code | Mid-market and enterprise buyers |
Plans side by side
Conga CPQ
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Agiloft
- Highly customizable, adaptable contract lifecycle management
- Deep customizability and agile workflow configurations
- Strong fit for mid-market and enterprise complex approval, compliance, and renewal needs
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Agiloft vs Conga CPQ”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/agiloft-vs-conga-cpq, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.