AirtableAI-Native App Platform
vs
HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Airtable vs Harvest
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Airtable is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 4.9 versus 2.7 for Harvest.
Choose Airtable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.9 vs 2.7)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27701 or SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- User-friendly spreadsheet-database hybrid for no-code work
- Collaborative operational data and lightweight workflows
Choose Harvest if…
- You want a lower entry price ($9 vs $20)
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Airtable | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.9% | 2.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #16 | #29 |
| Share of voice | 2.4% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 24% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Airtable 0pp · Harvest 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Airtable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AirtableHarvest
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Airtable ranked higher
0Harvest ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Airtable | Harvest |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, with US and EU hosting options | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27701, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, TX-RAMP Level 2 | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate |
| Support | — | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus |
| Founded | 2012 | 2006 |
| Funding | Series F · $1350M raised | Seed |
| Best for | Teams and enterprises that need to build governed, AI-enabled business apps and workflows without writing code. | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. |
Plans side by side
Airtable
Free$0user/month
Team$20user/month, billed annually
Business$45user/month, billed annually
Enterprise ScaleCustomcustom
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Airtable
- User-friendly spreadsheet-database hybrid for no-code work
- Collaborative operational data and lightweight workflows
- Customizable workflows for project management
- Connects well with many data sources
- Annual billing lowers per-seat cost
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Airtable vs Harvest”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/airtable-vs-harvest, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.