GlassboxAI-powered customer intelligence insights for proactive, preventive and secure digital customer experiences.
vs
PostHogYour product's context layer.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Glassbox vs PostHog
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
PostHog is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 21 versus 4.4 for Glassbox, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Glassbox if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 57% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
Choose PostHog if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21 vs 4.4)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Open-source, developer-first platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Glassbox | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4.4% | 21% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #17 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 32 |
| Positive in AI answers | 83% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Glassbox 0pp · PostHog 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
PostHog leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GlassboxPostHog
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Glassbox ranked higher
1PostHog ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Glassbox | PostHog |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which web analytics tool has the best reviews? | ChatGPT | #1 | #6 |
| Which Web Analytics vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #11 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Glassbox | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant cloud on AWS or Microsoft Azure, and multi-tenant cloud. | PostHog Cloud in US or EU regions, or self-hosted |
| Integrations | — | 926+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CSA STAR Level 1 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | — | Community support on the free plan, Email support on pay-as-you-go, Slack support for plans over $2k/mo, Paid onboarding call |
| Founded | 2010 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Minority investment from Poalim Equity · $70M raised | Series E |
| Best for | Highly regulated enterprises, such as financial services organisations, that need digital experience analytics with security and compliance. | Product engineers, product managers, growth engineers and founders who want analytics, session replay, flags and experiments in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Glassbox
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Glassbox
- Strong enterprise performer blending quantitative analytics with qualitative context
- Analysts frequently recommend it for combining event data with session replays
- Exceptionally high user ratings, around 4.8 to 4.9 out of 5 on G2
- Deep customer journey mapping and session playback
- Highest review rating among established web analytics tools
PostHog
- Open-source, developer-first platform
- All-in-one bundle of analytics, session replay, feature flags and A/B testing
- Transparent, public pay-as-you-go pricing
- Generous free tier for small teams
- Strong adoption and best value for startups
- Pricing often requires sales-assisted quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Glassbox vs PostHog”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/glassbox-vs-posthog, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.