ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
EspoCRMFree open source CRM for managing contacts, sales, support, and marketing in one place.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Apollo vs EspoCRM
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 0 for EspoCRM.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 or CCPA or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose EspoCRM if…
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 200+)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 9001 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Apollo | EspoCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #19 | #45 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo 0pp · EspoCRM 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Apollo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApolloEspoCRM
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Apollo ranked higher
0EspoCRM ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | EspoCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | Cloud-hosted or self-hosted (on-premise) |
| Integrations | 200+ | 2000+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 9001 |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | 12x5 support on Cloud plans, Community forum, Service request form |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Texas, USA |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | Raised Funding Round (undated, per Crunchbase) |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Small and mid-size companies that want an affordable, customizable CRM, including self-hosted deployments. |
Plans side by side
EspoCRM
Basic$15per user/month, minimum 3 users
Enterprise$25per user/month, minimum 5 users
Ultimate$69per user/month, minimum 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
EspoCRM
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs EspoCRM”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-espocrm, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.