ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
tl;dvThe AI Notetaker built for Team Collaboration
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Apollo vs tl;dv
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 2.8 for tl;dv.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 2.8)
- You need SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
Choose tl;dv if…
- You need more native integrations (5000+ vs 200+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 60% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU AI Act coverage
- robust free plan for recording and transcribing calls
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Apollo | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #19 | #24 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo 0pp · tl;dv 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Apollo leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Apollotl;dv
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Apollo ranked higher
0tl;dv ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | tl;dv |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 200+ | 5000+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EU AI Act |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | AI-supported chat and self-serve help center, Email and chat support, Priority customer support, Dedicated Success Manager on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Aachen, Germany |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | Seed (€4.3M, led by K Fund) |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Sales, customer success and internal teams that want meeting notes and CRM updates automated |
Plans side by side
tl;dv
Free$0forever
Pro$18per seat/month, billed annually
Business$29per seat/month, billed annually
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
tl;dv
- robust free plan for recording and transcribing calls
- AI summaries of Zoom and Google Meet sales calls
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs tl;dv”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-tl-dv, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.