AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs Claris FileMaker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appian is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 19.6 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Appian if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.6 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.6% | 1.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #6 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 31 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian −1pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appian leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppianClaris FileMaker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Appian ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums |
| Founded | 1999 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Later Stage VC · $1M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.