AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Appian vs Mastra
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mastra is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.3 for Appian, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appian if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
Choose Mastra if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 38% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #71 | #56 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian 0pp · Mastra 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mastra leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppianMastra
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Appian ranked higher
0Mastra ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Appian | Mastra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | Perplexity | #18 | #22 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $250 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | — |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST |
| Founded | 1999 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | San Francisco |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Series A · $35M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript |
Plans side by side
Appian
Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Mastra”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-mastra, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.