Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppianSerious AI. Built on Process.
vs
MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

Appian vs Mastra

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Mastra is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.3 for Appian, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Appian if…

  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration

Choose Mastra if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 38% positive)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Type-safe, production-grade application code

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appian Mastra
Visibility score0.3%1.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#71#56
Share of voice0.1%0.5%
Mentions this run13
Positive in AI answers38%100%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Appian 0%

Appian 0pp · Mastra 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Mastra leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0%
AI Mode
0%
1.7%
Perplexity
0.9%
1.9%
AppianMastra

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1Appian ranked higher
0Mastra ranked higher
PromptEngineAppianMastra
Compare the leading AI Agents platforms Perplexity#18#22

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppianMastra
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $250 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentAppian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid optionsSelf-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform.
ComplianceSOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization—
SupportAppian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or lessShared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST
Founded19992024
HeadquartersMcLean, VirginiaSan Francisco
Employees1,001–5,00011–50
FundingIPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raisedSeries A · $35M raised
Best forLarge enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational contextDevelopers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript

Plans side by side

Appian

Community Edition$0free personal development environment
StandardCustomuser/month/app
AdvancedCustomuser/month/app
PremiumCustomuser/month/app
Appian pricing

Mastra

Starter$0month
Teams$250month
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing
Mastra pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appian

  • heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
  • strong case management
  • suited to regulated industries
  • governed platform for AI agents
  • free Community Edition for evaluation
  • quote-based, less transparent pricing

Mastra

  • Type-safe, production-grade application code
  • Suited to serious production systems

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Mastra”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-mastra, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.