Appian vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appian is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 19.6 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appian if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.6 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 13% positive)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA or PCI DSS or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.6% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #6 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 31 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian −1pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appian leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #5 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #5 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #4 | #12 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #4 | #7 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #4 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 1999 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Funding round |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
Appian
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.