ApplicantStackThe affordable, easy-to-use online applicant tracking system and employee onboarding system.
vs
GemBetter recruiting, built on Gem.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
ApplicantStack vs Gem
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Gem is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 1.4 for ApplicantStack.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $130)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Choose Gem if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 1.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 5.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · Gem 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Gem leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApplicantStackGem
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ApplicantStack ranked higher
0Gem ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | Gem |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | $130 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | Web application and Chrome extension |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | Onshore support, success and development team |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series C · $148M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Growing talent acquisition teams, from startups to global enterprises, that want sourcing, ATS and CRM in one platform or AI layered onto an existing ATS. |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Starter$29.99per month
Growth$49.99per month
Recruit$109.99per month
Bundle$159.99per month
Gem
Gem + Your ATSCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem All-in-OneCustomCustom pricing based on company FTE count
Gem Startup Program$130per month, billed yearly
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Gem
- Strong option for recruiting teams in 2026
- Startup discount on yearly billing
- Candidate sourcing and interview management
- Career websites and candidate engagement
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs Gem”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-gem, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.