ApplicantStack vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.4 for ApplicantStack, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose ApplicantStack if…
- You want a lower entry price ($29.99 vs $299)
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.4)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ApplicantStack | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #49 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ApplicantStack 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | ApplicantStack | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| How much does a recruiting platform cost per month? | AI Mode | #2 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ApplicantStack | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $29.99 / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Online, with no software installation required | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | Support staff during standard business hours, Online help center, getting started guides and videos, Curated knowledge base | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized businesses, including start-ups and organizations with low-volume hiring needs | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
ApplicantStack
Workable
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ApplicantStack
- Budget-friendly entry-level pricing
- Discounted annual prepayment option
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ApplicantStack vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/applicantstack-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.