Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppsmithLow-code open-source application platform that simplifies custom application development
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Appsmith vs Claris FileMaker

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Appsmith if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 1.6)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Open-source and free to self-host

Choose Claris FileMaker if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appsmith Claris FileMaker
Visibility score17.6%1.6%
Change vs last weekup+1.9%New
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#7#37
Share of voice4.2%0.3%
Mentions this run232
Positive in AI answers48%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Appsmith 18%

Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
18.1%
1.1%
AI Mode
25.7%
0%
Perplexity
8.9%
3.7%
AppsmithClaris FileMaker

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Appsmith ranked higher
1Claris FileMaker ranked higher
PromptEngineAppsmithClaris FileMaker
Which low-code platform offers a free trial? Perplexity#6#1

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppsmithClaris FileMaker
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $15 per seat / mo$22 per seat / mo
Free planYesNo
DeploymentSelf-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-onCloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server)
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018
SupportCommunity support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on EnterpriseTechnical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums
Founded20192019
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CASunnyvale, California
Employees51–200201–500
FundingSeries B · $52M raisedLater Stage VC · $1M raised
Best forDevelopers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panelsTeams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises

Plans side by side

Appsmith

Free$0month
Business$15user / month
Enterprise$2,500month for 100 users
Appsmith pricing

Claris FileMaker

Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Claris FileMaker pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appsmith

  • Open-source and free to self-host
  • Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
  • Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
  • Favored by developers and technical teams
  • Transparent, predictable published pricing

    Claris FileMaker

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.