Appsmith vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Appsmith is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 17.6 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 33% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appsmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.6 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 13% positive)
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appsmith | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 17.6% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.9% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #7 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 23 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 48% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appsmith +1.9000000000000021pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Appsmith leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appsmith | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| How much does a low-code platform cost per month? | ChatGPT | #3 | #5 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #6 | #2 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #16 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appsmith | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, cloud, or managed hosting; air-gapped edition as an add-on | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Community support on Discord, Priority email and chat support on Business, 24x7 support with response time SLAs on Enterprise, Dedicated customer solutions engineer on Enterprise | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 2019 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | Funding round |
| Best for | Developers and engineering teams building internal apps, dashboards and admin panels | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appsmith
- Open-source and free to self-host
- Flexible approach with native JavaScript customization
- Strong fit for internal tools, dashboards and admin panels
- Favored by developers and technical teams
- Transparent, predictable published pricing
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appsmith vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsmith-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.