Ashby vs hireEZ

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ashby is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 17.4 versus 2.5 for hireEZ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ashby if…

You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.4 vs 2.5)
You want a lower entry price ($400 vs $494)
You need more native integrations (250+ vs 40+)
AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 29% positive)

Choose hireEZ if…

Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI-powered outbound sourcing
cross-platform talent mapping
diversity hiring support

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric	Ashby	hireEZ
Visibility score	17.4%	2.5%
Change vs last week	New	New
Rank in Recruiting	#7	#33
Share of voice	3.8%	1.1%
Mentions this run	21	6
Positive in AI answers	57%	29%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

Ashby 0pp · hireEZ 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ashby leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT

23.3%

4.4%

AI Mode

8.2%

0.9%

Perplexity

20.7%

2.2%

AshbyhireEZ

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

3Ashby ranked higher

0hireEZ ranked higher

Prompt	Engine	Ashby	hireEZ
What are the best recruiting tools in 2026?	Perplexity	#2	#12
Compare the leading recruiting platforms	ChatGPT	#3	#15
Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors	ChatGPT	#8	#21

Features, pricing & fit

Dimension	Ashby	hireEZ
Pricing model	Flat tiers	Per seat
Entry price	$400 / mo	$494 per seat / mo
Free plan	No	No · 7-day trial
Deployment	Cloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans	Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks.
Integrations	250+	40+
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II	—
Support	Customer success team	—
Founded	2018	2015
Headquarters	San Francisco, CA, United States	Mountain View, California, US
Employees	201–500	51–200
Funding	Series D · $120M raised	Series C
Best for	Ambitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiring	Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out.