Ashby alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Ashby
WorkableBest forCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.83% of Ashby answersGreenhouseBest forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises79% of Ashby answersLeverBest forSmall, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations.75% of Ashby answersManatalBest forHR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters42% of Ashby answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Ashby has a visibility score of 17.4 in Recruiting, #7 of 83. AI answers that name Ashby most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workable | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. | $299 / mo | 30.1% | An AI agent built into a full applicant tracking system, which reads the system of record before it acts and inherits the platform's security and access model. |
| Greenhouse | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Contact sales | 38.5% | Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal |
| Lever | Small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations. | — | 22.2% | ATS and CRM combined in one platform, with AI built across the hiring funnel rather than added through separate tools. |
| Manatal | HR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters | $15 per seat / mo | 15% | Claims to be the first ATS to offer an MCP server that connects to LLMs such as ChatGPT. |
Alternative 1
Workable vs Ashby →Workable
Workable suits companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses..
Quick facts
- $299 / mo · flat tiers
- 15-day free trial
- 30.1% visibility score · #2 in Recruiting
- 270+ native integrations
Key features
- Workable ATS — Applicant tracking system covering requisitions, sourcing, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics.
- Workable Agent — AI recruiting agents that source, screen and engage candidates inside the ATS, sold as four agents including Sourcing, Screening and Engagement.
- Workable HR — HR information system with employee onboarding, time off, time tracking, e-signatures and payroll preparation.
- Performance & Engagement — 360-degree performance reviews, performance tracking and employee surveys, sold as an add-on.
Workable vs Ashby
| Dimension | Workable | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 30.1% | 17.4% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | $400 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 15-day free trial | — |
Pros
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
Cons
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Alternative 2
Greenhouse vs Ashby →Greenhouse
Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting
Key features
- Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
- Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
- Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
- Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.
Greenhouse vs Ashby
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 17.4% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $400 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Cons
Alternative 3
Lever vs Ashby →Lever
Lever suits small, mid-sized and enterprise talent acquisition teams that need to scale hiring efficiently across departments or locations..
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 22.2% visibility score · #3 in Recruiting
Key features
- Lever AI-Powered Hiring Platform — ATS and CRM in one platform with reporting, AI screening, unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries, and AI fraud prevention signals.
- Candidate Insights — Add-on that surfaces skills, fit, assessments and reference data in the candidate profile.
- AI Screening by VONQ — Add-on that pre-screens candidates with AI agents embedded in the career site.
- Onboarding — Add-on for automated new hire workflows, task management and document collection.
Lever vs Ashby
| Dimension | Lever | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 22.2% | 17.4% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $400 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Combines applicant tracking with candidate relationship management (CRM)
- Strong talent relationship management (TRM) for nurturing passive candidates
- Recommended for startups and scaling tech companies
Cons
Alternative 4
Manatal vs Ashby →Manatal
Manatal suits hR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters.
Quick facts
- $15 per seat / mo · per seat
- 14-day free trial
- 15% visibility score · #8 in Recruiting
- 2500+ native integrations
Key features
- Manatal ATS — Applicant tracking system with customizable pipelines, a Kanban board, and candidate profiles.
- Recruitment CRM — CRM for agencies and headhunters to track clients, placements, and revenue.
- Manatal AI — AI Interviewer for automated screening, AI Copilot for candidate summaries, and AI candidate recommendations and scoring.
- Candidate Sourcing — Job posting to job boards and a Chrome sourcing extension, with candidate profile enrichment from social and public platforms.
Manatal vs Ashby
| Dimension | Manatal | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15% | 17.4% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $15 per seat / mo | $400 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 14-day free trial | — |
Pros
- Advanced AI-driven candidate enrichment and match scoring
- Affordable pricing with annual savings
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Cheapest per-recruiter pricing among compared tools
- Recommended for lower-cost recruiting software
Cons
- Entry plan limits the number of open jobs
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Ashby | Flat tiers | $400 / mo |
| Workable | Flat tiers | $299 / mo |
| Greenhouse | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
| Lever | — | — |
| Manatal | Per seat | $15 per seat / mo |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Ashby in the latest weekly run.