Skip to content
SlateIndex
AshbyAll-in-one recruiting software for ambitious teams
vs
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Ashby vs Greenhouse

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 17.4 for Ashby, and ranks ahead in 58% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ashby if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 56% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • Deep data visibility
  • Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 17.4)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Ashby Greenhouse
Visibility score17.4%38.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#7#1
Share of voice3.8%8.1%
Mentions this run2143
Positive in AI answers57%56%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Ashby 17%

Ashby 0pp · Greenhouse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
23.3%
43.5%
AI Mode
8.2%
33.5%
Perplexity
20.7%
38.3%
AshbyGreenhouse

Head to head in AI answers

19 engine answers name both brands

8Ashby ranked higher
11Greenhouse ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAshbyGreenhouse
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry price$400 / moContact sales
Free planNoNo
DeploymentCloud-hosted software as a service on Amazon Web Services, sold on subscription plans—
Integrations250+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS
SupportCustomer success team—
Founded20182012
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesNew York City, NY, United States
Employees201–500501–1,000
FundingSeries D · $120M raisedSeries D · $110M raised
Best forAmbitious, scaling companies from startups to enterprises that want one system for hiringEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises

Plans side by side

Ashby

All-In-One Foundations$400month
All-In-One PlusCustomcontact sales
All-In-One EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Ashby AnalyticsCustomusage-based
Ashby pricing

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ashby

  • Deep data visibility
  • Advanced analytics and detailed funnel reporting
  • Strong fit for well-funded, scaling tech startups
  • Good for data-driven recruiting teams
  • Strong shortlist choice for recruiting software

    Greenhouse

    • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
    • Strong reporting and data visibility
    • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
    • Integration ecosystem and unified data
    • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ashby vs Greenhouse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ashby-vs-greenhouse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.